What DuBose didn’t know was that Gomez was the subject of an international homicide warrant out of the Dominican Republic. She didn’t know because the government’s own attorney, Assistant U.S. Attorney Kevin Bolan, had been instructed by ICE not to tell her.

Two days later, DHS published a press release: “Activist Biden Judge Releases Violent Criminal Illegal Alien Wanted for Murder.” The clear implication was that this judge knew about the murder warrant and released the man anyway.

That was a lie. By May 5, the government’s own lawyer was in court saying so.

AUSA Bolan told Judge DuBose the press release “simply was not true,” apologized to her personally, and acknowledged that ICE had told him not to disclose the warrant. Here is the part that should stop you cold: ICE had already publicly posted about that same warrant on social media on April 16 — two weeks before the hearing. They knew. They’d already publicized it. They just chose not to give that information to the judge, then attacked her for not having it.

That is not a breakdown in communication. That is a trap.

---

One week after his own attorney apologized in open court, DHS General Counsel James Percival published an op-ed in The Federalist calling the press release “factually true” and accusing DuBose of “judicial misconduct” for objecting to it.

Percival is not a commentator. He is the top lawyer for the Department of Homeland Security — a sitting government official writing about a pending case in a partisan magazine, defending a press release his own government’s attorney had already admitted was untrue.

His “factually true” argument rests on the warrant being real. It was. But the press release wasn’t a warrant summary — it was an attack on a judge, implying she knowingly released a murder suspect. That implication was false. Calling a press release accurate because the underlying facts about the defendant were correct, while ignoring that the attack on the judge was false, is technically precise and morally bankrupt.

Percival also argues DuBose exceeded her jurisdiction — a legitimate legal debate. But it has nothing to do with whether the press release was honest. He is hoping you won’t notice he swapped one question for the other.

---

Judge DuBose is now living under a federally-generated public narrative that she released a murder suspect — a narrative the government itself confirmed was false. Her security has been put at risk; she said so in court. The press release is still live on the DHS website.

There is a word for using the machinery of the federal government to humiliate and endanger a judge who ruled against you, then calling her objection “misconduct.” The word is intimidation. It doesn’t become less of what it is because the person doing it went to law school.

The government set the trap. Their own attorney admitted it. And then their General Counsel called the trap a ruling.

---

Sources: The Federalist (James Percival, May 12, 2026); Techdirt (May 13, 2026); Rhode Island Current (May 1, May 5, May 13, 2026); Boston Globe (May 1, May 4, May 14, 2026); Lawfare (Roger Parloff, May 12, 2026); DHS press release dated April 30, 2026 (still live as of publication); DOJ/USAO-RI response to show-cause order signed by Assistant U.S. Attorney Kevin Bolan.

Karen Attiah spent eleven years at The Washington Post. Eleven years as an editor, then a columnist — the only full-time Black female opinion writer the paper had. During that time, she covered democracy, human rights, and the experiences of Black women with the kind of precision and moral clarity that good journalism demands. She was, by any fair measure, exactly the kind of voice a paper like the Post should want.

Then Charlie Kirk was shot and killed. And Attiah, like any journalist would, went to her platform — in this case, Bluesky — and wrote about the moment. She talked about America’s long relationship with gun violence. She talked about the pattern of this country extending sympathy toward political violence when the perpetrators are white men. And she raised something that turns out to have consequences at one of the country’s most prestigious newspapers: the documented record of what Kirk had said about prominent Black women.

Here is what Kirk actually said, on his podcast in July 2023, speaking specifically about Joy Reid, Michelle Obama, Sheila Jackson Lee, and Ketanji Brown Jackson — four of the most accomplished Black women in American public life: “You do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously. You had to go steal a white person’s slot to go be taken somewhat seriously.”

Those are his words. On the record. Spoken publicly, about four named Black women at the top of their respective fields.

Attiah referenced those words in her posts, and it is worth being precise here: the version she shared condensed and generalized the quote, removing the specific names Kirk targeted. That distinction matters — it is exactly the kind of detail Defend Her holds itself to. But what is beyond dispute is this: the underlying statement was real. Kirk said it. It is documented. And it was about Black women’s intellectual capacity.

The Washington Post fired her by email. No conversation. No warning. After eleven years.

Management called her posts “gross misconduct” that endangered the safety of her colleagues. Let that sit with you for a moment. A journalist referencing what another public figure had proudly said on his own broadcast — a statement that itself went unchallenged at the time of its publication — somehow endangered colleagues. But Kirk’s original statement about four specific Black women’s minds? That required no such alarm from the paper. No editorial response. No pushback. Silence.

---

Now, I want to be fair here, because fairness matters. Every employer has the right to set conduct standards. The Post has a social media policy, and reasonable people can disagree about where the lines should be drawn.

But let’s also be honest about the pattern.

When Attiah was let go, she wasn’t just an employee losing a job. She was the last full-time Black female opinion voice at a paper that shapes how millions of Americans understand the world. Before her, a string of prominent Black journalists had quietly departed — Courtland Milloy after nearly five decades of metro column writing, Krissah Thompson who had spent 24 years there and was the only Black managing editor on the masthead, veteran columnists Joe Davidson and Vanessa Williams, Pulitzer Prize winners Robin Givhan and Colbert King. One by one. Quietly. The kind of institutional erasure that doesn’t make headlines because it’s done gradually, not all at once.

And here’s what the data tells us about the broader picture: in 2025 alone, Black women lost 95,371 federal government jobs — a third of the total federal workforce contraction, despite representing just 12 percent of the federal workforce. The Teen Vogue merger with Vogue.com, announced in November 2025, wiped out another culturally engaged outlet where Black women’s voices had a home. Across media, the pattern is the same: when budgets are cut and priorities are “reset,” it is Black women’s perspectives that are labeled expendable first.

This is not coincidence. This is a structure.

---

There’s a version of this story where someone says, well, she should have been more precise in how she cited the quote. And I understand that argument. I do. Accuracy matters — it is the standard we hold ourselves to at Defend Her, and it is a standard every journalist should hold themselves to.

But I want you to notice something: the response to Kirk’s statement — even an imperfect, condensed version of it — was treated as a fireable offense. The original statement itself, a public declaration that four of the most accomplished Black women in America lacked the intelligence to have earned their positions, produced no such institutional response. No correction. No editorial distance. No consequence.

That asymmetry is not an accident. That is a choice. And choices like that — made at major institutions, by people with enormous influence over whose voices the public hears — have consequences that reach far beyond one woman’s job.

When you make it professionally costly to even name what someone in power said, you don’t make the underlying problem go away. You just make it easier to pretend it isn’t there.

---

Karen Attiah, for her part, has not gone quietly. She’s writing on her own Substack now. Readers found her. Her voice didn’t disappear — it just moved.

That matters. Because the goal, when you strip it down to its core, was never just to fire one journalist. The goal is to communicate to every Black woman watching: know your place, or this is what happens.

But here’s what history keeps showing us — and what I find genuinely hopeful in moments like this: that message almost never lands the way it’s intended. Ida B. Wells reported on lynchings when the mainstream press refused to — and the effort to silence her only made her legacy permanent. There is a long tradition of Black women refusing to disappear just because someone decided their voice was inconvenient.

We should all be paying attention to that tradition right now. Not just to honor it — but to continue it.